Framer

Framer’s video ad: “Comment “Agent” and I’ll send you the exact prompts I used.”

Running 35 days·Facebook and Instagram·Winner

How it opens

“Comment “Agent” and I’ll send you the exact prompts I used.”

Angle: Comparison

Why it works

It has run for 35 days and is still running, on 13 ads at once. Brands keep paying only for ads that make money, so this one is proven. First-person ads read like a post from a real person, not an ad.

How it’s built

1. Hook: Comment “Agent” and I’ll send you the exact prompts I used.
2. Benefit: I tested Framer Agent vs Claude Design, and the biggest difference wasn’t just the final website. It was how each tool gets you there.
3. CTA: Sign up

What to borrow

• Compare with the old way or the category, never a named competitor.
• Test a ugc ad for your own product.
• It has run for over a month: the idea is proven demand, so test it in your own words.

Its words

👉🏻 Comment “Agent” and I’ll send you the exact prompts I used. I tested Framer Agent vs Claude Design, and the biggest difference wasn’t just the final website. It was how each tool gets you there. Claude feels faster and more hands-off. It’s great when you want to move from a prompt to a working, interactive result quickly. But AI-generated layouts can also fall into familiar patterns unless you give the model a very clear visual direction. Framer feels closer to designing with an Agent. Everything stays editable on the canvas, so you can jump in, adjust the layout, refine components, manage responsive versions, and publish from the same place. ➡️ So the real choice is less about which AI generates the better first draft, and more about the workflow you prefer: Claude for speed and quick interactive builds. Framer for control, flexibility, and taking the design further. For me, Framer wins, but I’m curious which one you’d choose.

Button: Sign up

What’s said

The transcript

Framer Agent vs Claude Design, I put them head to head to see which one actually builds better websites, and here are the results. Same prompt, same Opus 4.8 model. Framer started by building reusable navigation and button components, then moved into the full page. It took longer but created more distinctive sections. Claude finished much faster and delivered a more interactive site, but the layout felt more generic and repeated similar patterns across sections. Both are pretty strong, but Framer gave me more than just a finished site. It built reusable components and a full style system I could easily adjust. Next I tried Sonnet 5, the cheaper model, with a more specific corporate prompt. In Framer, you can watch it build in real time and tweak the layout while the agent keeps working. Claude gave me less control during the process, and the final result still felt less flexible and just a bit harder to edit. Framer's infinite canvas makes it easy to take the design further. Layers on the left, styles on the right, and one publish button to make it live. Claude gets you to the result, Framer lets you make it yours. Let me know which one you choose, and comment agent to get the exact prompts I used.

Where and how long

• First ran 5 Sep 2026; still running.
• Run as 13 ads, 13 of them running now.
• Links to framer.com.
• Style: UGC, Comparison.